0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.11/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.11/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 03:52:19 EDT 2025
0.11/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.35	This is a THF_ problem
0.11/0.35	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.11/0.36	Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gkEAMCEn6E/E---3.1_2510.p -m 16384 -t 240
0.11/0.38	% (2722)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/183Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2725)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/27Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2726)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/2Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2727)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/2Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2723)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/4Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2728)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/275Mi)
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Instruction limit reached!
0.11/0.38	% (2726)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Termination reason: Unknown
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Termination phase: Property scanning
0.11/0.38	
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Instruction limit reached!
0.11/0.38	% (2727)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.11/0.38	% (2726)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.11/0.38	% (2726)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2726)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Termination reason: Unknown
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Termination phase: shuffling
0.11/0.38	
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.11/0.38	% (2727)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
0.11/0.38	% (2727)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2727)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Instruction limit reached!
0.11/0.38	% (2723)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Termination reason: Unknown
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Termination phase: Property scanning
0.11/0.38	
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.11/0.38	% (2723)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.11/0.38	% (2723)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2723)------------------------------
0.11/0.38	% (2729)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_2510 for (2399ds/18Mi)
0.11/0.39	% (2728)First to succeed.
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.11/0.39	% SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_2510
0.11/0.39	% SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_2510
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_2, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_3, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_5, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_6, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_7, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_8, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_18, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_21, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_22, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_23, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_24, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_25, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.11/0.39	thf(func_def_32, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.11/0.39	thf(f267,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  $false),
0.11/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f266])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f266,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ($true = $false)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f261])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f261,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ($true = (~ $true))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f140,f258])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f258,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f257])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f257,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ X2) = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(argument_congruence,[],[f253])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f253,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)))) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f250])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f250,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1) = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) @ X1))) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(argument_congruence,[],[f195])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f195,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f194])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f194,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ($true != $true) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f185])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f185,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true))))) | ($true != ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ($true)))) @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f165])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f165,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X0 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0)) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f158])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f158,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != $true) | ($true != (X0 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)) | (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI = X0)) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f151,f149])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f149,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f127,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f126])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f126,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f19])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f19,axiom,(
0.11/0.39	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
0.11/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gkEAMCEn6E/E---3.1_2510.p',ax)).
0.11/0.39	thf(f151,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | (X1 = X2) | ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true)) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f150])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f150,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X1 = X2) = $true) | ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true != (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f139])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f139,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ( ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o,X0 : $i,X1 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (~ (X1 = X2))) | ($true != (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true)) )),
0.11/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f138,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ! [X0,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true != (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) | ($true != (~ (X1 = X2))))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f123])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f123,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ~? [X0,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true = (X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) & ((X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i) = $true) & ($true = (~ (X1 = X2))))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f122])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f122,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ~? [X0,X1 : $i > $i > $o,X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X1 @ X0 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X1 = X2)) & (X2 @ X0 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f35])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f35,negated_conjecture,(
0.11/0.39	  ~? [X10,X18 : $i > $i > $o,X17 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X18 @ X10 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X17 = X18)) & (X17 @ X10 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f34])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f34,conjecture,(
0.11/0.39	  ? [X10,X18 : $i > $i > $o,X17 : $i > $i > $o] : ((X18 @ X10 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (~ (X17 = X18)) & (X17 @ X10 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gkEAMCEn6E/E---3.1_2510.p',con)).
0.11/0.39	thf(f140,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f83,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  ((~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
0.11/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f82])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f82,plain,(
0.11/0.39	  (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f11])).
0.11/0.39	thf(f11,axiom,(
0.11/0.39	  (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))),
0.11/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.gkEAMCEn6E/E---3.1_2510.p',ax_002)).
0.11/0.39	% SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_2510
0.11/0.39	% (2728)------------------------------
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Termination reason: Refutation
0.11/0.39	
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
0.11/0.39	% (2728)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
0.11/0.39	% (2728)------------------------------
0.11/0.39	% (2728)------------------------------
0.11/0.39	% (2714)Success in time 0.029 s
0.11/0.39	EOF